Supporting Your Child Through Results Day: A Parent’s Guide

If your child’s results were not what they hoped for, the most useful thing you can do in the first hour is considerably less than you probably want to do. The instinct is to move straight to solutions — clearing, resits, appeals, phone calls — partly because it is genuinely helpful and partly because it is easier than sitting in the disappointment with them. But a young person who has just opened a bad result is usually not ready to plan, and a conversation that starts with options can land as though the feeling has been skipped over. The practical work will be much easier this afternoon. What matters this morning is that they know you have understood the first part before you move to the second.

What Your Child Needs First — and Why Plans Can Wait

There is a predictable shape to how results day conversations go wrong. A young person comes in with a difficult result. A parent, wanting to be helpful, begins identifying what can be done about it. Clearing. Remarks. Resits. Alternatives — each of these things is practical and, in due course, useful. But in the first hour they can read as a message that the feeling was too uncomfortable to sit with — that the parent has moved on before the child has even had time to register where they are.

The most useful thing you can do in the early part of the day is demonstrate that you understand what has happened before you start working on what comes next. This is not about withholding practical help. It is about sequencing it correctly. Acknowledgement first. Options later. The gap between those two moments does not need to be long — sometimes an hour is enough — but it needs to exist.

Why leading with options tends to go wrong

When a parent moves quickly to problem-solving, a young person often experiences two things at once: being helped, and being told that the feeling is something to get past rather than something real. The second message tends to be louder than the first. It does not matter that the intention is support. What lands is that someone found it easier to plan than to stay. Slowing down in the first hour is not indulgence. It is the most strategic thing you can do before any practical conversation begins.

What to Say — and What to Avoid

The most useful opening on results day is an acknowledgement rather than a plan. Something close to: “That’s really disappointing. I’m sorry.” Or simply: “That’s not what we were hoping for.” These sentences name the feeling without trying to alter it. They confirm that you understand what has happened before any conversation about what happens next.

There are also phrases that reliably make things worse. Anything that starts with “at least” tends to land as though the feeling is being minimised before it has been named. Asking “what happened?” is usually experienced as an accusation — on results day they are unlikely to know, and being asked makes the disappointment feel like something they have to explain and defend. Comparing their result to a sibling, a friend, or your own exam history rarely helps.

The practical rule: in the first part of the day, ask less and say less. Sit with it. A conversation that has room for silence is often more useful than one that fills every gap with solutions.

The phrases that tend to close the conversation

“There are other paths” — true, rarely helpful before they have processed where they are. “I know you can do better” — implies the result is primarily a reflection of effort. “At least you still have [other option]” — skips directly to the thing you want them to feel better about. “You didn’t work hard enough” — if true, they already know. Said before they have sat with the result, it closes everything. The timing matters more than the content.

Your Own Disappointment — the Thing Nobody Says

Most parents feel their own version of results day disappointment, and most of them feel vaguely guilty about it. They were invested in a particular outcome. They had imagined a specific next chapter. When the result changes that picture, there is a real loss. It tends to go unspoken — and yet it is usually visible anyway, because most young people are very good at reading parental disappointment even when nothing is said. Pretending it is not there rarely works as well as parents hope.

What matters is not whether you feel it — you are allowed to feel it — but where it goes. Name it to yourself clearly before the conversation begins, then make a practical decision about when and where you deal with it. Call someone. Go for a walk. Give yourself until evening. The disappointment does not need to disappear. It needs to go somewhere other than the kitchen table this morning.

How to manage it without adding it to theirs

If you need to respond in the moment and feel the disappointment surfacing, say less rather than more. “That’s hard. I’m here.” is a complete sentence. You do not have to perform emotions you do not feel, and you do not have to narrate the ones you do. There will be time, once the sharpest part has passed, to have a more honest conversation about what the result meant to both of you. That conversation is worth having. It just does not belong in the first hour.

When They Won’t Talk

Silence on results day is common. A young person who is processing a significant disappointment may not want a conversation — not with a parent, not with anyone. This tends to be temporary, and the most useful response to it is usually not to pursue the conversation more actively.

Staying physically close without requiring conversation tends to work better than direct questioning. Practical presence — making food, suggesting going for a drive, sitting in the same room with something else to do — keeps the door open without making talking feel like an obligation. Young people who are not ready to talk often become ready when the pressure to talk has been removed. The opposite is also reliably true.

If the silence continues for several hours, a simple check-in is fine: “I’m here when you’re ready.” This does not pursue anything. It leaves something to come back to. Beyond that, giving it until the following day before pressing is usually the right approach.

Staying close without crowding

The general principle is that presence lowers the stakes of talking, while direct questions raise them. Making food, offering a lift, watching something together — these create conditions in which conversation can happen without conversation being the point. If it opens up, follow it. If it does not, you have still done something useful. Being physically around, without making your presence conditional on them engaging, is often the most supportive thing you can do in the first half of results day.

The Practical Conversation — When and How to Begin It

There is no correct time for the practical conversation, but there are signs that it is becoming possible. The most reliable sign is that they raise it themselves — that they begin asking about options or next steps. Another sign is that the emotional temperature has lowered enough that a practical conversation would not feel like a change of subject from a painful one to a convenient one.

When you do begin, it helps to frame it as exploring rather than deciding. “Let’s look at what the options are” leaves more room than “here is what we are going to do.” The practical options — Clearing, remarks, resits, alternative routes — are all worth understanding, but none requires a decision on the day. Your role is to help map the terrain, not to choose the route. For specific guidance on processes — Clearing timelines, appeals procedures, UCAS contacts — their school or college is the right source.

Keeping options from becoming pressure

The risk with the practical conversation is that options become obligations — that presenting what could be done starts to feel like a message about what must be done. A young person still processing disappointment may experience a list of options as a new list of things to perform. Pacing matters. One option at a time, with space in between. No requirement to decide anything today. No timelines imposed beyond the ones that actually exist — and most have considerably more room than results day feels like.

When to Take It Seriously

Exam disappointment is real, but for most young people the sharpest feeling eases within one to two weeks as the practical picture becomes clearer. It is worth paying attention to when it does not.

Signs worth taking seriously include: low mood that persists beyond two or three weeks after the result; withdrawal from friends or activities they previously engaged in; significant changes in sleeping or eating patterns; difficulty engaging with daily life in ways that go beyond ordinary upset. These signs do not mean something has gone catastrophically wrong. They do mean the result has landed on something that needs more than time and practical options.

If you are worried about your child’s wellbeing, their GP is a good starting point. If you believe your child is in immediate danger, call 999.

How to raise the idea of support

Frame counselling as space rather than intervention: “I think it would help to talk to someone who is outside all of this — not me, not school. Someone you can be honest with.” Most young people respond better to this than to being told they need help. It positions support as something useful rather than as evidence that they have not coped well. If they are resistant, leave it open and come back to it in a few days.

• Qualified & registered therapists
• LGBTQIA+ affirming support
• NCPS organisational member
• Online nationwide
• Face-to-face across England
• Established 2014

THE AUTHOR

Ian Stockbridge

• MBACP (Senior Accredited)

Founder & Clinical Director — Hope Therapy & Counselling Services

MBACP (Senior Accredited) · SNCPS (Acc) · BSc (Hons) CBT · PGCert Clinical Supervision

Founder of Hope Therapy, published author, clinical supervisor, and co-presenter of The Talk Room Podcast. Practising therapist with 25+ years of senior leadership experience.

Before Ian Stockbridge was a therapist, he was a leader. For more than 25 years he worked in senior management and directorial roles across commercial organisations — at times managing teams of more than 200 people. He was effective at it. But the longer he did it, the harder something became to ignore. The people around him were struggling. Capable, committed, often high-achieving people carrying invisible weight that had nowhere to go. Stress accumulated quietly across months and years. Anxiety managed behind professionalism. Relationships and mental health dealt with in the margins of a working life that left little room for either.

• SCoPEd Band C
• 25+ Years Leadership
• Clinical Supervisor
• Published Author
• Podcast Co-Host
• BSc (Hons) CBT
• PGCert Clinical Supervision
• LGBTQIA+ Affirming

View Ian’s Full Profile →